top of page

Innovation on Hold: When Tax Incentives Crowd Out SME R&D

Sep 1
2 min read

Updated: Oct 9

Innovation on Hold: When Tax Incentives Crowd Out SME R&D. Using firm-level panel data on Vietnamese SMEs, the study finds that receiving a tax incentive substitutes for firms' R&D intensity by about 3 percent. That is a crowding-out effect, and it points to the need for a more transparent tax system. Hoang Nguyen Quoc Thanh and Nguyen Quynh Huy (HAPRI Senior Research Associate). Illustrative photo of a small Vietnamese workshop office. A business owner sorts tax paperwork at her desk while an unfinished electronics prototype sits idle on a workbench behind her. This is not the study site.
Innovation on Hold: When Tax Incentives Crowd Out SME R&D

Tax incentives are meant to buy more innovation from small and medium-sized firms. New research on Vietnamese SMEs finds the opposite: receiving a tax incentive substitutes for firms' own R&D spending by roughly 3 percent — a crowding-out effect rather than a boost.


Context

Tax incentives have become one of the most widely used public policy instruments for pushing firms toward innovation, and interest in them has grown among both researchers and governments in recent years. The logic is straightforward — lower the after-tax cost of research, and firms should do more of it.


That logic rests on an assumption worth testing: that public support adds to private research effort rather than replacing it. Whether government support complements or substitutes for a firm's own R&D intensity is an empirical question, and for smaller firms in an emerging economy the answer carries real budgetary weight.


What rises, what falls
What rises, what falls

Methods

The study uses firm-level panel data on Vietnamese SMEs and applies an instrumental variables strategy, which helps separate the effect of the incentive itself from the characteristics that make a firm likely to receive one in the first place. The analysis asks two linked questions: what tax incentives do to technological innovation performance, and whether they complement or substitute for R&D intensity.


Key findings

  • Receiving a tax incentive substitutes for SMEs' own R&D intensity by approximately 3 percent — evidence of crowding out, not crowding in.

  • The pattern scales with the size of the benefit: firms receiving larger tax incentives invest less in R&D than firms receiving none, a "sand-the-wheel" rather than "grease-the-wheel" effect.

  • The authors theorize a political-economy channel: collusive relationships between firms and political entities reward the expansion of political networks over investment in uncertain, high-risk research projects.

  • The policy implication points less at the incentives themselves than at how they are administered — toward greater transparency and accountability in the tax system.


Policy implications

The authors say these findings provide policy implications for more transparent and accountable administration in the tax system.

Fix the administration, not the incentive
Fix the administration, not the incentive

Keywords:

  • Tax Incentives

  • R&D Crowding Out

  • SMEs

  • Innovation Policy

  • Vietnam

  • Instrumental Variables

Link:

Citation:

Hoang Nguyen Quoc Thanh, Nguyen Quynh Huy (2026). Innovation on hold: Tax incentives and R&D crowding-out effects among SMEs in Vietnam. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 1-16.

bottom of page